Talking of creating new words, the Israel-Palestine conflict has helped Septicisle come up with a new one; prosor n. To present an issue as fantastically simple when it is anything but. Also to put all the onus on the other side when in a dispute. Ron Prosor n. prop. rhyming slang. “Have you seen the article by the Israeli ambassador in the Guardian? What a Ron Prosor.”
St Andrews had the delight that is Ron Prosor come to give a speech a while back. The paranoia about security was good fun (perhaps that’ll die down after the Conservatives repeal universial jurisdiction?) meaning a constant change in venue and people being throw out for looking, well, a bit shifty and brown. But one thing that would have improved his visit ten-fold, would have been the introduction of my new Israel-Palestine drinking game. Because, judging by his article in the Guardian, it would have been a quality mash up. So let’s play it in retrospect. The numbers in brackets denote which rule the comment has broken e.g. [2, 4] is the first number of fingers, and the number of bullet points down. So [2, 4] would be “Clash of Civilizations”
Groucho Marx famously quipped: “Those are my principles, and if you don’t like them … well, I have others.” The International Quartet (the US, the UN, Russia and the EU) has long applied three principles Hamas must adopt to take part in negotiations. It must renounce violence, recognise Israel and abide by previous agreements between Israel and the Palestinians. At no point has Hamas satisfied these conditions – or indicated any intention to do so.
Because Israel has renounced violence? Because Israel recognises a Palestinian state? Aye, take a shot people [1, 8]
This week marks the fifth anniversary of Israel’s disengagement from Gaza. We withdrew every Israeli soldier and citizen, gambling on the formula of land for peace. Instead of peace and progress we received missiles and misery. Hamas made Gaza a terrorist enclave, launching thousands of missiles at Israeli civilians.
Harvard’s Sara Roy, the leading scholar on the subject has this to say; “with the disengagement from Gaza, the Sharon government was clearly trying to preclude any return to political negotiations… while preserving and deepening it’s hold on Palestine.”
Dov Weisglass, Sharon’s advisor also stated that the aim of the disengagement was to relieve international pressure and prevent an independent Palestinian state.
So, take another shot people. [1, 6]
In 2006 it kidnapped Gilad Shalit, holding him in isolation for four years without a single visit from the Red Cross.
Prosor neglects to tell his audience that Israel happens to hold thousands of Palestinians in isolation without trial, many of which are children. Bottoms up again [1, 8]
In a bloody coup in 2007 Hamas attacked its own people, chasing Fatah out of Gaza and hurling its Palestinian brothers from the rooftops.
Again, Prosor gives us the revisionist history. He doesn’t tell us the US and Israel supported a coup against Hamas, who acted in reaction to this. I’m also loving his concern for the Palestinians being hurled off rooftops. Apparently this is the epitome of evil, but bombing these same people is fine. Take another shot [1, 6]
Simultaneously it relentlessly attacked Israelis and, with Iranian support, stockpiled weapons that today can hit Tel Aviv.
Ignoring double standards is starting to get very repetitive. That Israel relentlessly attacked Palestinians and, with American support, stockpiled weapons that today can (and do) hit Gaza City, is of no consequence. Take another shot. [1, 8]
After years of missiles, the bombardment became unbearable. We targeted the terrorist infrastructure through Operation Cast Lead.
Targeted terrorist infrastructure? O rly? Down another one [1, 6]
Israel has tried to stop the flood of weapons through a naval blockade
Yet another lie. Dove Weisglass, the Sharon advisor previously mentioned, said “‘The idea is to put the Palestinians on a diet, but not to make them die of hunger,’ … The hunger pangs are supposed to encourage the Palestinians to force Hamas to change its attitude towards Israel or force Hamas out of government.” Anyone getting drunk yet? Well, take another anyway [1, 6]
When Hamas supporters attempt to break the blockade, as occurred with the Turkish IHH flotilla, Israel’s defensive measures must be understood in context.
Well, yes, the context of starving the Palestinians into submission.
Some in the west fondly refer to Hamas as the elected representatives of the Palestinians.
Notice the “fondly” as if Prosor is saying many in the West support Hamas. Who this Hamas supporting “some” are isn’t mentioned. He goes on with a bizarre strawman
While Hamas won the Palestinian council elections in 2006, it was not a mandate to violently overthrow the Palestinian Authority. Nor does it justify terror against Israel. Hamas’s concept of democracy fits that of all democratically elected dictatorships – “one man, one vote … once”
So apparently some in the West believe winning an election justifies a terror campaign. Umm
Gaza was a golden opportunity tragically missed. Instead of building a Mediterranean Dubai, Hamas diverted every resource to enslaving its people while attacking ours.
Yes, after 40 years of what Sara Roy calls an Israeli policy of “dedevelopment”, Gaza could have become a desert paradise. It’s hard to know if anyone actually believes this nonsense. Perhaps a Disneyworld in Rafah refugee camp is also in order? Another shot [1, 6]
President Abbas has declined talks, preferring to campaign against Israel internationally
I love this term “campaign… internationally.” It recognizes global sympathy for the Palestinian’s plight but turns it into an insult. Glorious!
After plenty of shite, Prosor comes up with this absolute beauty
If in Gilo no sniper fire means no wall, so in Gaza no missiles would mean no blockade. It is that simple.
The sheer idiocy here is breathtaking. An absolutely outrageous lie, one that any remotely clued up person could see through. But this guy is the Israeli ambassador baby, and utter shit like this is the norm. Of all the lies he shits out of his lying mouth, this takes the biscuit. Drink to your hearts content people, because frankly this is too depressing to read sober.